Dusty Chalk

Not as bizarre as Antec's new one:

Audio Technica W2002 are pretty much cream-worthy. That said, I don't care how ugly they are if they live up to the marketbabble.

So the big new technology is that it's a ring instead of a solid circle?

I almost said the black ones were also Reference 3A's, but the slope didn't seem sharp enough...

I have that. I was totally gay for anything that had the word "techno" or "trance" in it. I probably have 20 volumes of the Techno Trax series of compilations. And Volume. I think I have everything on this page except for Sally's Photographic Memory and Deep Trance and Ritual Beats and Chakra Journey. Alright, maybe 95% of everything on that page.

There is in my world. Of course, I have no idea how to let anyone else besides me in, so you're on your own.

I see Reference 3A (I think) and Wilson Benesch, but can't name either from the first pic. Nice rug you've got there, really brings the room together.

I refused to drive directly after playing Cybersled at the arcade. You have a tendency to want to change lanes by giving the steering wheel a quick turn to the left followed by a quick turn to the right.

Any particular reason you went for the LG as opposed to anything else? The 2ms response time, perhaps? I been going back and forth between a 1920x1200 and a 2560x1600 (although at this point, since I already bought the graphics card, I am probably going the latter).

I thought it was newer than that (I.E. I thought the ability for the iPhone to download through iTunes via 3G was announced as of Macworld). Did you use 3G or did you use something else (I.E. wi-fi)? Also, how's to know whether the track in question wasn't already 256/DRM-free? There were already some...

Nice abs.

Well, sorry, I didn't mean anything disparaging by that remark, I have no problem with (my definition of) the term, 'audiophile'. In fact, I'm not even sure where that little background post came from -- I guess I was just saying I have no idea what the headphone scene back then consisted of.

I had no idea what audiophile meant before about 1999/2000, as I only "listened to music" on my dad's monaural Heathkit and my Pioneer SX-450. So I was a HD414 man for a long time, and then a Sony MDR-V6/-7506 man from somewhere around 1990 on.

Snarky response #1) The cover is the least of your problems... Snarky response #2) Have you heard the music? Snarky response #3) Hey, that's my mother you're talking about! Snarky response #4) ... ...actually, no, I better stop.

Welcome to yesterday. (In other words, not that long.)

Isn't that called "C.O.D."?

I'm trying to figure out what the poor decision was -- got bukkake'd on? Or is that wax?

Dew et.

椎名 林檎, 加爾基　精液　栗ノ花 -- haven't listened to this in a while, but wasn't tired of it yet, just got busy with other things. It's still my favorite older discovery of last year.

Yeah, that image of the Kharma Grand Ceramique about half-way down is the one I was thinking of.

Looks like they mostly do alright, but those two negative feedbacks look concerning: linky

I've never been one to appreciate being politically correct.

Amazon == good. But I guess it depends on the merchant -- a lot of those are filled by other than Amazon. I presume you mean Rolex...

Well...you still have to compensate for the two (top-to-bottom, and the diameter one). Although, if one were to extrapolate from spheres, supposedly that's easier. Me personally, in my dreams (the ones in which I build a pair of speakers, not the desert island with a bunch of hotties one), I intend to use computer modeling to figure out some sort of random based one that has the fewest modes, sort of like the Kharma ...Ceramique? Was it? I remember seeing a picture of the insides in a review in Absolute Sound.

Prokofiev a la Berman -- pretty much all of them.