On the contrary, Amarro "Mini" is focused on pure playback, and is specifically targeted at audio nuts. link
And the reasoning goes, "this program is doing something, therefore it is DSP". That middle part is in your mind.
Do you know what DSP is? Digital Signal Processing. Digital -- meaning in the computer, not on a turntable -- Signal -- works with audio signals -- Processing -- "doing something". I think you're attributing connotations to DSP that aren't part of its proper denotation (definition). DSP does not necessarily mean that it does FFT's or dithers or anything else, it just means that it does something to the signal. The end. Attenuation? DSP. Pretty much has to be.
I mean, it's quite possible it does nothing, but if it doesn't do anything, why not just listen to iTunes? That's the part I'm having a hard time with. I wouldn't want to pay $400 for something that does nothing. (That's what I was trying to say earlier with my shakti stones comment.)
What am I misunderstanding?