-
Posts
48,567 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
66
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Dusty Chalk
-
Someone stop me, I'm getting GAS about Guitars again
Dusty Chalk replied to Post's topic in Miscellaneous
Dude, all of my guitars are gimmicky -- I have a plexiglass/acrylic one, an "aluminator" from Rogue, made entirely out of metal (with cutouts so that it doesn't way a ton), and a Steinberger (one of those headless/bodyless jobbers). Well, (a) most of the music I make is by tapping, for some reason (it just seemed natural); and ( that's why I want the NS/Stick -- it can be strummed and picked and stuff. It would sort of ween me into playing "normal" guitar. Someone also mentioned Warr guitars and Anderson something guitars, which I may look into as well. -
Someone stop me, I'm getting GAS about Guitars again
Dusty Chalk replied to Post's topic in Miscellaneous
Well, that's what I'm trying to decide. I'm more of a keyboardist than I am a guitarist, so I find myself tapping a lot when I screw around on the guitar, but I want to learn guitar proper, hence the thought of getting the NS/Stick...but I love the sound of an active bass (and Chapman Stick, of course), so I'm thinking in that direction, too (also, we don't currently have a bassist in the band, and it'd be nice if I could double, at least as far as writing/recording goes). I guess the deciding factor is if I can get sufficient bass out of a NS/Stick to write basslines, or if I should just go straight to a Chapman Stick. I think I'll end up getting both over the next couple years, but I'm trying to decide which to get now (or rather, "...soonish", as they aren't cheap). -
Someone stop me, I'm getting GAS about Guitars again
Dusty Chalk replied to Post's topic in Miscellaneous
Grazi. -
Someone stop me, I'm getting GAS about Guitars again
Dusty Chalk replied to Post's topic in Miscellaneous
Hey, Jahn, what's a good musical instrument forum? I want to ask some questions about active basses and Chapman Sticks and NS Sticks and Steinberger basses and stuff. I've got G.A.S. -
Part number for Beyer pad for Sony MDR-7506/-V6?
Dusty Chalk replied to Dusty Chalk's topic in Headphones
Danke schoen! Is that any cheaper than Beyer charges for them? I guess I can call them and find out. -
Part number for Beyer pad for Sony MDR-7506/-V6?
Dusty Chalk replied to Dusty Chalk's topic in Headphones
Danke. -
Does anyone know (a) the part number for the Beyer pad that fits on the Sony headphone, and ( either the URL, or how to order it from Beyer? I can't seem to find it, now that they've revamped their site. I know it's the pad to the DT-250, but that's all I know.
-
Friend: Why do you have wires and an iPod dangling out of your mouth? Me: Well, she sneezed while I was...
-
I missed that. And I claim to be a Pink Floyd fan. I suck. LOL, you're actually looking at the album covers.
-
Hard to tell. Wall girl looks like the actress that played Jenny from Buffy, but that's about all I can tell. I imagine DSOTM girl is asian (so therefore automatically +1 in beauty), but am not sure. And I've always had a thing for redheads, so there's that... What I do know: [wayne]I want to touch the hineys.[/wayne]
-
Now there's a buttcrack or two I'd like to spackle... I have that one in poster form.
-
No, it sounds like just one very massive kettle drum hit...recorded in a cave...I don't think you guys are hearing it. It's like the bass was off for the rest of the song, and suddenly the subwoofer turns on...except I was listening on headphones.
-
I was talking about the last sentence, I.E. " I still think a lot of "huge" and "night and day" changes people report is largely a factor of the ears and brain adjusting to a new sound." -- I just think it's funny that I accuse you of brainwashing yourself when you're accusing us of brainwashing ourselves. (Overstatement, but I think I've explained the joke now at this point, which I hate doing.) I continue to think you're wrong. I don't usually listen to my equipment as it burns in (except speakers, and even then, I try to keep it to a minimum). Let me rephrase that: I believe you're right about most people. I believe you're wrong about me by lumping me in with that weak-minded crowd.
-
You keep telling yourself that.
-
I brought pretzels! The first time I heard it, anyway. Those Newman's Own Bavarian pretzels? Of course I didn't call them a bribe at the time (one doesn't do that), I just said, "you have to try these". And yes, I do want to hear it again, once you fix it/it burns in/whatever.
-
What the hell is going on at 1:39 of this track? That's more than a kick drum. On a side note: I challenge anyone with good bass on their headphones to listen to that track and say that the bass at that point isn't "visceral" (NSFW -- "I don't give a fuck you fucking fuck" being amongst the lyrics). You should feel that bass down somewhere around your diaphragm.
-
Congrats! I had my fingers crossed for you the whole time. Been trying to send you positive vibes, but then my fingers cramped up, so I started swearing at you. Sorry about that. Anyway, glad you are finally employed!
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH5gA3YrzVE&NR Yes, that Barney. Watch it anyway. NSFW due to language.
-
Judges say: over-ruled. He explicitly refered to the EA-4 as new, so when he said 'new' again, I just presumed he meant the EA-4 again. How was I supposed to know that when he said 'new', he actually meant (pauses for Shatner-esque intake of breath) new? I mean, shit, that was just Aug 1... Phidolox -- so is it going to be truly balanced this time?
-
So there's a bestest evar that's better than the current bestest evar? Well, all I can say in my own defense is that the picture that was shown was of an EA-4. If he mentioned another amp, it wasn't in this thread. EA-9? That's what it should be (IMHO). As it should.
-
Yeah, it's the EA-4. It's at the bottom of this page.
-
And just to get this conversation back on track... I'd love to, and possibly will, when I am in the market for an amp for my currently non-existent 4070's and ESP-950's. Probably next summer, I think.
-
Yeah yeah, takes one to know one and all that. Touch yourself in the daytime. Difference is, I'm right. If you're going to be a fucking pedant like I am (that's "your majesty king fucking pedantness" to you), you should at least be correct about it. As has already been stated, I'm just pointing out that a certain correction was fallacious. What I'm trying to do is reinforce my argument by explaining subtle shadings in what are both correct phrasings -- my personal interpretations. I never said "your" wasn't correct, I was just concurring that you were incorrect for correcting incorrectly. It is the generic buck -- that which is being saved or spent.