Its interesting that, sadly, we've been here before
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/23/jon-stewart-mocks-conservatives-trying-to-suppress-gun-control-debate/
and how familiar the points and sides taken appear.
I understand the emotional argument, who would want this to happen to their child. or anyone.
Then there's the rational argument.
How big a risk of this is to you on a daily basis?
Statistically road deaths are a bigger threat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year
Yet where is the outrage and the call to ban car ownership? possibly because we weigh the costs / benefits.?
What would be a proportionate response to this? I don't have any answers,
and the debate here touches any many issues, freedom , trade-offs, the rule of law etc in the political experiment that is the United States.
But what is encouraging is that we can have the debate, and that its broadened to take in other related issues.
What world do you want to live in?