I seem to recall that they managed to improve the capability of the touch by adding a swap partition when using external drives ... This would be even better using an ssd rather than hdd. I'll see what I can find in the slim forums after the weekend. Likewise as long as the file paths are the same it shouldn't matter if (pre) processing was done on another machine
Looking good Adrian.
Surprised you didn't go for a Jacuzzi instead (mind you, you might be there for a while with the Searzall )
Here's what Heston did http://youtu.be/0WniZ1ly5Ik http://youtu.be/neqq8imstlc
Now at our (non HC) friends
There was sous-vide pork
Conventionally toasted pound cake
Topped with Stracciatella and Caramel Cone Ice Cream
They know me well.
Nate, are you still into DIY?
Vortexbox gives you the software to host Squeezebox server, and handle ripping duties.
Then you can use jivelite /squeezelite to control it from a touch screen
http://www.instructables.com/id/Wall-Mounted-SqueezePlayer-with-Raspberry-Pi/
(touch screen is ~$200)
Storage is cheap, cheap enough for an SSD - no moving parts.
Now put it all in one box
That the sort of thing your were looking for ?
To wind up my local Apple fanboi, I've benchmarked Siri / safari searches vs Google / chrome searches on the same (Apple) hardware, which shows that it's down to the software, and the back end servers, rather than the hardware being the limiting factor. Which annoys him intensely
Due to information on Google / YouTube, and a delivery from Amazon today,
Replaced this
and this
With this
And this
Thanks internets!
EDIT: and yes I did remove the plastic bags, first
EDIT: Of course fish bacon is already a thing http://www.fieldandstream.com/blogs/honest-angler/2012/10/fish-bacon-because-fried-fillets-arent-unhealthy-enough
As opposed to bacon fish