Well creating security issues is my job. It is pretty common to use advertising for things like this. We call it "malvertising". I honestly do not have much of a reality check on what people perceive to be possible or pervasive, but it is interesting this is something you havent run across. We have actually sold technology to a lot of the big online presences that rely on advertising via banners to prevent these malicious images from getting syndicated.
Ask Apple how well that process goes. I personally have had remote webkit exploits for safari that they took 6 months to create a patch that didnt fix the issue.
Regardless, I don't manage updates they work just fine from Samsung/Google.
Just curious, how do you (and Inu) define max resistance for the 2K trimmer? The wiper shorted to the leg of R32 or R33? I am not sure "max" makes sense here.
My point is that he makes a claim and offers a warantee but it is not clear what the parameters of the claim are. If it was COSC certified that would clear things up, but pre-COSC makes it harder. It it loses 30 seconds a day for example would he be liable to fix it and perhaps replace parts that wouldn't have been covered by the routine maintenance he just performed? It is the fact that he gives himself an out on the page is all I am pointing out.
Is your movement COSC certified? I ask, because right after the warrantee information he has a caveat that says: "because of age and technology at the time, please do not expect a vintage timepiece to be as accurate as modern watches".
Did he offer any guidance on what to expect in terms of accuracy? In otherwords, how inaccurate can it be and he will still take it back and fix things without you incurring additional cost?