simple. you'll have more data variance in the impedance plots and they will be make a much better comparison. For example, one things I use impedance plots for in speaker design is to determine which frequencies the enclosure itself wants to resonate at. This would be interesting data for headphones. I'd recommend looking at D'Appolito's book on speaker testing. It's pretty much the reference on the subject, besides IEEE journal articles.
I'd say pretty hard. Depending on where you get the replacement cable, it will have either foil leads or some sort of stranded wire. The foil leads are damn near impossible to work with. This is the older style cable. Plus is, that they come off the driver very easy. I'd liken this process to doing SMD soldering in its intricacy.
you don't need something like AP. Just download Speaker Workshop and use the play back / recording features built into that. You may need a simple cable with some known impedance, but it should work very well.
you should post the impedance curves. these mean a lot more than the frequency response does, as the frequency response and phase data can be recovered via a Hilbert transform. This is the beauty of the Thiel-Small work.
Both are excellent drivers. I went with Per Skanning's new company, as I could get a custom driver made for no up-charge, as all of the C-Quenze are made to order.
if said person wants to step forward, they probably have a good idea of total cost by now. Size is a 19 L (0.67 cu ft) vented enclosure. Graph is SPL at the point where the port noise becomes audible ("chuffing") and this occurs at 39 watts.
Here's the woofer modeling:
My limited experience with orthos can be summed up as follows:
if you:
A.) want to like an electrostat but keep trying to make it sound like a dynamic headphone without success
B.) think the SR-007 is "dark"
C.) like the Jade
then you should try some orthos.
nope, not over-analysis, just that many recording or sound reproduction systems are off-pitch or introduce pitch issues, hence the annoyance.
edit: perhaps I disagree with the term over-analysis. It's an innate/subconscious analysis, not an purposeful analysis.
I've found you have to leave these on for a while to get them sounding good. Not burn-in per se, but just have to be running 24x7 for some reason. I cannot explain it, but this DAC always sounds crappy at meets for some reason, and I've attributed it to this reason.
Nice find though.
I just tested this last night. Trafo was an R-core with single primaries with marked phase. A 3A fuse blew when they were installed in one orientation, but not the other. YMMV.
in an ideal world, it would be 2 crossovers. and since it never is, then this is my issue. Plus, the crossovers are too simple and cannot do things like impedance flattening, which is very important in the low end region.