Pars

Happy Birthday Justin!

Marc, Don't know as I haven't completed mine yet, or even gotten to the point that I could test it (slow build mode ). I am using a Pesante Dissipante 2U 300 case for an SE build, so should be good heatwise. I will be using a single sigma22 as the PSU, with a 120VA (I think, might be 160?) SumR tranny.

Happy Birthday (belated)!

Nope. Plays it inverted, however. Fear back on...

DigiPete can step in here, but I would think you could go longer on the boards and still retain Dynahi compatibility? As long as the output transistors are on the same footprint so you could use identical mounting brackets, it should be OK. Not sure on mounting holes on the other end; whether those would need to be in the same place?

Good point Nate. And your post was not taken in a bad light whatsoever.

8A. Still only 1000V though (only... hehe).

Got one. Including home-made leads. Bridge works too. My dad doesn't have a lab (and wouldn't have a clue as to what we are talking about, but I digress).

Measured using the drop across the 2 ohm resistors? I assume this is something like Q27, Q31, Q28 and Q32 (half populated)? Why the big discrepancy between the + and - rail gates? Once again, why the discrepancy between + and - rails (I assume these figures are for 1.11V for R27, R28, and 1.74V for R29 and R30)? You discerned enough of the Blowtorch from that epic thread to build one?

Yeah, I always get them as good as I can, then pop the servo in and relax. Under 1mV or +/- 1mV without the servo is plenty good, at least on I/V boards with no feedback (those are harder to get stable than the dyna---- are).

From article: North American reach includes (may not be limited to): Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida ,

Grawk liked his As said, if you can build it yourself, sigma FTW

Did you try it without the servo in? Usually I see how low I can get offset and then put the servo in.

Happy Birthday!

I think it was an embarrassment to him when someone posted the link to the proper USB spec, instead of the Wiki spec that he (they?) had been using. I agree that if it is marketed as a USB cable, it better meet spec. He deleted that post, then made the decision to delete the rest of them. I suppose some of this comes back to the Amphora thread responses, etc. as well.

I see all posts other than the announcement were deleted (the last one first, in which someone provided a link to the real spec... bad form!), and then the thread was locked. As mentioned by edwood, I do like the jacket... quite appropriate.

Now if you move this debate on to virgin nymphs of the rainforest, etc., I think you'll be onto something!

Oh boy... Cables cannot "boost" anything... amplification or gain is required for that. Cutting (opposite of boost) would also be difficult without a little box of passive parts such as MIT uses.

2n3904/3906 are among the most common and generic transistors in existence. Don't worry about it.

Wiki USB Spec: No one should point that out BTW. Just let them muddle along...

Is your Capitole still there?

I'm sure it will be spun as a plus when it is revealed that a HD or the like will not run off of this cable... the sound would be too "digital" if it did

Sorry to hear Al. Hopefully someone other than Mikhail will get this thing sorted out for you.

Thanks Steve. I may try that, think my boss has a biscuit joiner I could borrow. Here is another pic that shows the carpet detail a bit better. Looks like the outer frame is thicker than whatever is underneath it (I assumed plywood). I had considered using an "L" shaped pine molding piece to do this right on the plywood, but I am not sure how it would hold up.

Cool anyhow. Too bad about the smell.