Seems he still has thousands of 5687's to peddle. He hasn't totally vanished as he continues to offer new amps to people that placed orders a long time ago. Of those cases I've never seen an amp that actually had the features the people wanted, just some random stuff off the shelf. Could be something in for repair which he fixed and is trying to sell off.
For a desktop rig then the 2050 system is hard to beat. The SR-202 may be the baby of the range but it sounds almost as good as the SR-404LE which the 303/404 do not. The amp may not be a power house but it has more then enough grunt for the Lambdas and it is a design refined which has been refined for over 20 years. Now if you want an Omega, then I'd do what Milos suggested.
I never said it was easy but you should be able to do it in 10 minutes.
I will hear them soon enough...
Still in hiding was the last I've heard. It's hard to make a comeback when you have tens (if not hundreds) of thousands in gear in for "repair" that would cost a fortune to fix.
I hope it is the same transformer but only time will tell. If it does indeed have 6 wires from the primary then simply measure the DC resistance of the wires to see which wire is which (0-100V-117v).
I have a feeling that that CA stuff isn't half as good as any standard contact cleaner but then again I'm not an optimist. Shorting the switch would be a good idea and it will show you what the problem really is.
Since I don't have an E.90 here I asked Kevin to test his and see what's what. For the record I've never had any problems with the ESP950's I've owned over the years, on Stax amps, adapters, Gilmore amps and that crazy DC-DC supply Marc came up with.
Could be but could you do one thing for me, measure the amp output. If the amp sits at -300V then a +300V bias would result in +600. I seriously doubt that this is the case but it was something which KG did with his DC coupled tube amp.
The voltage sags in a split second and then stays at that value so try turning off the auto ranging on the VC99 and see what is the first number you see, that would be closest to the true value. Also the VC99 isn't as accurate as a Fluke 179 so I'd try decreasing the bias down to 200V or so.
The mineral wool is basically glass and that doesn't conduct with these voltages.
Well Koss does state the bias voltage to be 600V:
But I've been working after similar lines that the Stax bias supplies simply aren't compatible. 10M/10M will half the voltage but it is strange that there is no ballast resistor. I'm going to ask KG...
Odd indeed. Strange behaviour like this can present it self when you have a driver which has arced quite badly so there is some carbon left on the diaphragm. This will shorten the D/S gap and cause the oscillation and other weird stuff to happen of the bias is raised a bit. Most of the SRD units are running a bit below spec (since most of them were made in a time when the NB spec was 200V and not 230V) plus the load resistors are generally smaller. Now assuming you set the bias with a meter that didn't overload the bias supply causing it to sag and thus give out more voltage in real life this shouldn't be an issue but it has been known to happen.
As for the diodes, they shouldn't fail but you can safely remove them to see if it is the problem. I always did when working on NB phones since most of us know the dangers of overloading the drivers.
As for using KuboTen, you just register and then place bids through the form on their site. It's not as interactive as Rinkya but neither will Craig throw out part of your purchase or charge insane amounts for shipping...