Jump to content

spritzer

High Rollers
  • Posts

    14,493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Everything posted by spritzer

  1. If you want to use a 6SN7, I'd always use the 6SN7GTB's since they are higher voltage. I wouldn't touch the PSVANE tubes nor believe their specs though...
  2. Check the resistors in the power supply, they are known to go bad.
  3. For me the 007's are a clear step up in every way, much more controlled, actually layered sound stage (which so few headphones can do) and far more resolving. Once you get past a certain point the SR-Omega gets lost and confused. They are still great but yeah, 007's were a big improvement. I really don't agree about the X9000 bass compared to the 007's, it completely falls flat on its face. Apparent resolution vs. real resolution to me.
  4. Price is always tricky, the 007's should be far more expensive based on the parts and their quality but the true cost has been amortized over the last 25 years. The CRBN without the forged carbon, CF headband and the fancy metal mesh could have been far cheaper. Then you have the issue of things being far too cheap so they aren't taken seriously. They way I see it is CRBN vs. Voce, both made in the US and similar enough in price these days. Voce is trash though...
  5. This shit is just too retarded!! 😂 I for the record gave the entire 009 lineup another chance recently. Since they are so cheap now, for even like new used sets, I got a 009 and 009S... and they are still awful. This was actually one of the last 009's to be made and still sounds the same as my very early example. The 009S was also pretty new and yeah, still sounds the same sad mismatch of ideas. As for the X9000, it's not top of the line by any stretch of the imagination. Since I got a pretty much brand new SR-Omega for my birthday this summer I dragged out the X9000 for comparison and that lasted two songs... I couldn't get rid of the X9000 fast enough so it's back in the display case. Next comparison was SR-Omega vs. SR-007 nr. 35 of the production line... much closer but the 007 is easily better in every way.
  6. I don't really give a shit what you think but my views/impressions are never for sale. The CRBN is flawed but still an excellent set of headphones with production quality rivaling Stax is many ways. In terms of sound, that is always subjective, but it's clear, based on the market, that people are not happy with where Stax are going. Used prices of 009's are now often below that of a used 007 (not even a rare Mk1) and the 009S's are headed that same way. Also notice how little talk there is about the X9000 from the long term Stax owners, those that did buy a set, quietly sold them off as they just aren't good.
  7. Not sure, ones been sitting unsold in Japan for weeks for just over 3k$.
  8. Nope, no way to do that and with roughly 40% failure rate, no way I'm ever touching one of them again.
  9. This just makes the original Stax T2 sad... That hum's like there is no tomorrow.
  10. No, not wasting my time on that pile of crap
  11. One of the sets I received had that issue and Audeze replaced it, it was far too touchy.
  12. Thanks everyone. Just got back from London, first proper trip since the whole pandemic nonsense and fuck am I tired... 😂
  13. No KGSS Klassik has ever come in for servicing so highly reliable I'd say. Closest comparison would be a fully modified 717.
  14. It's a voltage divider feeding a voltage doubler
  15. Great work and Stax had endless issues with the SR-Omega... same as Sennheiser with the glass stators.
  16. Well it is certainly not something brilliant but we'd need better pics of the amp section to be sure. I'm certainly not impressed by the 9$ Alps RK27 volume control...
  17. That was excellent and what happened to that original Jr. set?
  18. If you are using a Samsung drive they have their own utility which is excellent for this stuff.
  19. I have plenty of them in stock but they were not cheap.
  20. New design
  21. Ehhh Mk2.95 now... we kinda boxed ourselves in with the 2.9 moniker... 😉 Not much different from the Mk2.9 (which dates back to 2014 at least) , new earpads being the biggest change.
  22. They are a bit more relaxed sounding and neutral to me. It's not a huge difference but the L500Mk2 gave a wow feeling for the first time in a long while when I first put them on. I just got them for the bloody cable... 😉
  23. The L500Mk2's are excellent and probably the best new Stax on offer aside from the 007's (which are hardly new at this point). Far more balanced than they used to be and easy enough to fit L700 earpads if that is your thing
  24. No real change and I just put them away as I got new toys. I did give them another chance and yeah.. I'm never going to use these, it is unforgivable for me that they can't play all music without sound off, some songs are just not right. They are just placed in my reference collection now and... yeah I'm not happy about this. Hell I'd take the L500Mk2 over them...
  25. This thing is actually worse than previously thought when you look at it. So first thing, never, ever use the balanced input... those are clearly opamps next to each XLR socket so... yeah badly converted to SE. Pure quality there... Then we have one input tube feeding both EL84 push-pull output stages so it has to be a phase splitter for them. There is not a whole lot of gain here plus the limitation of the choke being used... this is pretty dire A bit of context here, when you dig through history, the first ever mention of electrostatic headphones (DIY) is from the 50's and something like this is what was suggested as the amplifier to drive them... as there were push-pull tube amps everywhere at that time. Leave the output transformer secondary floating, take the signal through caps off the output tube plates, some high value resistors to ground after the caps and a simple bias off the B+. So this is somehow high end now?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.