postjack

yes

"step into the realm you're bound to get caught / and from this worldly life you'll soon depart" <- ?uestlove those motherfuckers define what a hip-hop show is. completely electrifying.

no no, books good tv bad.

I'll do that. I will be buying it eventually.

I definitely will, I'll try it out tonight. Hopefully I won't get clicks like another headcaser reported (Icarium I think?).

Have we done this one before? http://www.thesneeze.com/mt-archives/cat_steve_dont_eat_it.php If we have, it bears reposting.

HagUSB

also, here is Jeff Vandermeer washing a cat: seriously, how awesome is this guy?

I've read G.G. Kay's The Lions of Al-Rassaan, its a great book! I intend to read more Kay in the future. I've never read any Marion Zimmer Bradley, but I've heard her name.

No, I haven't seen it, and I probably won't. I don't mind violence, but I can't watch rape.

Yes, Bakker is definitely guilty of infodump overload, and we might could say he could have benefited from a strong editor. I'm hoping he continues to refine his craft and mature in his writing. The best is yet to come for Bakker, me thinks. As for exceptional must reads, check out my above post I was typing while you were typing.

China Mieville is probably the most popular after Gaiman. His most popular works include Perdido Street Station, The Scar, and The Iron Council. PSS was his first, probably the best place to start. Jeffrey Ford is another brilliant mind. He has a series called "The Well-Built City" which starts with [ame=http://www.amazon.com/Physiognomy-Jeffrey-Ford/dp/0380793326/ref=pd_sim_b_shvl_title_2/103-0220401-0351813?ie=UTF8&qid=1190920242&sr=8-5]The Physiognomy[/ame]. However, my favorite is Jeff Vandermeer. His most essential work is [ame=http://www.amazon.com/City-Saints-Madmen-Jeff-Vandermeer/dp/0553383574/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-0220401-0351813?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190920381&sr=1-1]City of Saints and Madmen: The Book Of Ambergris[/ame]. This is actually a collection of short stories set in his mythical and overall fucked city of Ambergris. CoSaM, while an amazing read in and of itself, provides essential background information necessary to fully appreciate Vandermeer's first true novel, [ame=http://www.amazon.com/Shriek-Afterword-Jeff-VanderMeer/dp/0765314665/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/103-0220401-0351813?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190920493&sr=1-2]Shriek: An Afterword[/ame]. Basically Shriek is the sequel to one of the short stories in CoSaM, written from the perspective of the sister of the narrator of the short story, which is a history of Ambergris. So I wholeheartedly reading CoSaM, and if you think its cool, then check out Shriek. Taken together, they are one of the most outstanding stories I've read. For a quick read of Vandermeer's not set in Ambergris, check out his novella Veniss Underground, which is horror/sci-fi. Its layers and layers and layers of fucked-upness. Layers, I tell you. So while I'm digging up those amazon links, I stumble across this upcoming anthology: [ame=http://www.amazon.com/New-Weird-Ann-VanderMeer/dp/1892391554/ref=pd_bbs_3/103-0220401-0351813?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190920669&sr=1-3]The New Weird[/ame], ed. Ann and Jeff Vandermeer. The blurb sums up the new weird well: "This avant-garde anthology that presents and defines the New Weird?a hip, stylistic fiction that evokes the gritty exuberance of pulp novels and dime-store comic books?creates a new literature that is entirely unprecedented and utterly compelling. Assembling an array of talent, this collection includes contributions from visionaries Michael Moorcock and China Mi?ville, modern icon Clive Barker, and audacious new talents Hal Duncan, Jeffrey Ford, and Sarah Monette. An essential snapshot of a vibrant movement in popular fiction, this anthology also features critical writings from authors, theorists, and international editors as well as witty selections from online debates." Also, here is Jeff Vandermeer's working definition for New Weird, taken from a recent entry on his blog: "New Weird is a type of urban, secondary-world fiction that subverts the romanticized ideas about place found in traditional fantasy, largely by choosing realistic, complex real-world models as the jumping off point for creation of settings that may combine elements of both science fiction and fantasy. New Weird has a visceral, in-the-moment quality that often uses elements of surreal or transgressive horror for its tone, style, and effects? in combination with the stimulus of influence from New Wave writers or their proxies (including also such forebears as Mervyn Peake and the French/ English Decadents). New Weird fictions are acutely aware of the modern world, even if in disguise, but not always overtly political. As part of this awareness of the modern world, New Weird relies for its visionary power on a ?surrender to the weird? that isn?t, for example, hermetically sealed in a haunted house on the moors or in a cave in Antarctica. The ?surrender? (or ?belief?) of the writer can take many forms, some of them even involving the use of postmodern techniques that do not undermine the surface reality of the text."

Ooh, R. Scott Bakker's "Prince Of Nothing" was remarkable. I agree that it was a difficult read, a bit too heady at times, but you have to admit its a hell of an accomplishment for an author's first series. Achamian is such a great character though, and the final scene in the final book was soooo punk rock, I love it. Bakker's supposed to be doing a sci-fi thing next.

There has been a resurgence of new thinking and creativity in the fantasy genre in the past decade, a collection of young writers who rever Michael Moorcock and M. John Harrison. I already mentioned some of their names: Jeff Vandermeer, China Mieville, Jeffery Ford, and of course Gaiman, amongst others. Some people are dubbing this group "New Weird". Its an apt enough description.

luckily there is so much GOOD fantasy and sci-fi out there that I don't have to read a bunch of tired old shit. In a world with Jeff Vandermeer (the fucking KING), Steven Erikson, Jeffrey Ford, China Mieville, Neil Gaiman, and M. John Harrison, I don't have to waste my time on the Goodkinds and Jordans of the world.

i'll take your word for it.

is the new wheatfield out already?

balanced desktop?! edit: where is jpak, he always has the low down on people's purchases.

admittedly I haven't read all of WoT or all of SoT, but based on the four books I read in each series before I wised up, Goodkind is the worst. First, Richard and Kahlan are the worst couple ever in history. Second, all the excuses Richard makes to not go hone his art with Zed are ridiculous, the WORST use of delay tactics to prolong a story I've ever come across in a genre that is rife with them. "Oh Zed I know if I don't train my power it'll get me sick and I'll explode or whatever, but I don't have time for that now because I have to go map the hidden deserts of the sand people or whatever". And in the first book, Darth Vader or whatever the fuck is name is bans fire, because he was burnt as a child? Wow thats so deep Terry Goodkind. And then he gets into all that weird quasi-communist speech that totally comes out of nowhere. Plus in real lilfe Goodkind is a prick who swears he doesn't read any fantasy, when obviously he borrows half his shit from Robert Jordan.

"just bought an MS2 / throw some flats on that bitch"

http://apuresound.com/v3.html looks neat-o.

Truly sad about the passing of Robert Jordan. I stopped at book four and honestly think WoT represents the worst in epic fat fantasy, but still he was one of the big names in this genre I love so much. Actually Terry Goodkind represents the worst in epic fat fantasy. And Steven Erikson represents the best in epic fat fantasy. Malazan is soooo awesome.

whatever, mr. big government liberal. fucking communists are everywhere, even moderating one's favorite audio forums.

well even if Gravel is the most compatible candidate amongst all test takers, its still only 14.20% compatibility, which makes it pretty remarkable that a lot of us are scoring for him. At first glance the site appears to be a military site, which would make me think it is more conservative then not. anybody taken an MBTI? i wonder how many INTJs we have here...

x2. star fleet academy rules all.