revolink24

What's wrong with Pentax? The K-x is more than a worthy adversary to the D5000 and T1i, plus has in body stabilization. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxkx/page29.asp It's fairly sharp, but not terribly sharp. If I had thought more about it I would have adjusted the shutter speed accordingly, but I was being stupid and had it on 1/400 when the camera supports 1/6000. Having a $700 lens that is sharpest around f/11-f/13 helps as well. Everyone here loves headphone pictures, right? I've got them too. f/2.8 | 1/15s | ISO 1600 Taken with Sigma 17-70 2.8-4.5

I couple months ago I attended one of the shows in Mark Knopfler's Get Lucky tour. Haven't had much of a chance to see anything else, since I somehow managed to miss Bob Dylan at my college campus.

f/29 | 1/400 | ISO 100 f/5.0 | 1/100 | ISO 800 f/5.6 | 1/800 | ISO 3200 f/4.5 | 1/100 | ISO 800 f/8.0 | 1/2500 | ISO 12800 All with Pentax K-x and Pentax 100mm 2.8 WR Macro.

That's really too bad, I saw that discussion in the chatroom earlier. Is there anyway to get audiogon staff involved?

I don't know how many of you saw these already, but I'll post them anyway. I'll list the Exif for picture 2, as that's the better one. Pentax K-x, | f/13 | 1/40s Shot in Aperture Priority with automatic white balance (Yes, I'm lazy.) RAW conversion in Lightroom, no other postprocessing. Taken with Pentax D FA 100mm 2.8 Macro WR. Entry level DSLR bodies and pro-level glass actually make an awesome combo. Oh, and one more thing: Yes, I know I need a sensor cleaning.

SMC Pentax D FA 100mm f/2.8 Macro WR (Catchy name, eh?) And yes, this is my first post here. I've been converted to the dark side.